recycling is good, reusing is much better
In the not too distant past, Apple was getting a lot of flak about their resistance to implementing a recycling program for their products. While I am not surprised that Apple is bad about recycling, there is one very important thing that is not talked about much in the world of electronics: building devices to be repairable and upgradable. Apple builds their computers to be solid and upgradeable. They have one of the best repair records in the industry for laptops, and more importantly, Apple owners use their computers much longer than any other computer maker.
Also, Apple generally makes it easy to upgrade and fix them yourselves, and there is a real market for it. (http://ifixit.com) Compare that to any other maker. I just sold my 5 year old, 800Mhz PowerBook with a broken screen for $200. Compare that to a refurbished, 2-3 year old 1.4 GHz Dell laptop with a 90 day warranty for $300. It’s hard to even find Dell laptops for sale older than 3 years.
To be clear, in no way do I support Apple’s resistance to implementing computer recycling, that’s a important effort to keep all that toxic material out of the ground. But I think that the debate over recycling is coming at the expense of the more important issue of building devices to last. The making of electronic devices generates a lot of pollution and requires a lot of energy and resources during the manufacture. Yet people treat them as disposable. Apple is fully complicit in this when you look at iPods and other devices. If there was a small effort put into making electronics repairable and upgradeable, we’d save a lot of money, energy, and pollution.
Call me sentimental, but I got quite attached to my old powerbook, and had it been possible to fix, I would have. Instead it is going to be an organ donor and I bought another one which I hope to have for longer than 5 years.
Even over a year later I think Apple can learn alot from Dell about recycling. I also think the industry needs a little more accountability about the “numbers” they piblish from a third party.
Recycling: Greenpeace likes Dell’s recycling program a lot more than Apple’s. While Apple says it has recycling facilities in 95% of its markets worldwide and boasts a recycling rate of 18%, Greenpeace thinks the company’s numbers are too opaque to trust. The same goes for Dell’s reported numbers of 12.4%, but Greenpeace gives Dell extra points for supporting laws that would make manufacturers more responsible for the waste they produce. Both companies are terrible at reporting how much recycled plastic they use.
On a good note, helicopters get recycled, on a bad note they haven’t created a “efficient” or “hybrid” helicopter yet. I want one when it comes out though….
Comment by helicopters — December 24, 2008 @ 2:11 am
I totally agree that Apple needs to get better on recycling, that’s for sure. It would be great to see Dell start making their computers easier to repair as well. Unfortunately, it seems that Apple is getting derailed in this regard, the newer MacBooks are getting harder and harder to repair. The keyboard used to be trivially easy to replace, now it requires a total disassembly of the machine.
Comment by .hc — December 24, 2008 @ 2:50 pm